Blog der Hauptbibliothek

Why every scientist needs Scifinder-n

22. April 2021 | Anna C. Véron | Keine Kommentare

Do you know SciFinder-n? If you’re a chemist, you’ll most likely answer with yes. To scientists of other disciplines, however, this literature database and intuitive search tool is hardly known. In this Coffee Lecture, we demonstrate how you’ll greatly benefit from SciFinder-n, no matter whether you’re a researcher in the life sciences, medicine, physics, earth […]

Fortsetzung

Abgelegt unter:Coffee LecturesCourses and LecturesE-ResourcesGood to knowHistory of MedicineTips for Physicians & Health ProfessionsTips for Researchers
Tags:

It does not always have to be a systematic review

18. February 2020 | Sabine Klein | Keine Kommentare

The systematic review of randomised controlled trials (with or without meta-analysis) is an important tool when appraising e.g. the effectiveness of interventions, although its place on top of the evidence pyramid is being discussed (1). But apart from the systematic review, there is a number of other review types. In a recently published article 48 […]

Fortsetzung

Abgelegt unter:Tips for Physicians & Health ProfessionsTips for Researchers
Tags:

Which databases must/should be searched when conducting a systematic review of the literature?

5. July 2019 | Martina Gosteli | Keine Kommentare

According to the Cochrane handbook, at least the databases Embase, Medline (e.g. via Medline/Ovid or PubMed) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (TRIALS) must be searched for relevant literature (1). Depending on the investigated topic, specialised databases (e.g. Cinahl for nursing, PsycINFO for psychological interventions, AMED for complementary medicine, BIOSIS for life sciences, […]

Fortsetzung

Abgelegt unter:E-ResourcesTips for Physicians & Health ProfessionsTips for Researchers
Tags: